Forum libero

- Scritto da:
> che palle, ma devi continuare così per il resto
> della tua
> vita?

beh sto vedendo la tv e sto cazzeggiando al pc ,non mi pesa cazzeggiare anche qui

che palle, ma devi continuare così per il resto della tua vita?

- Scritto da:
>
> L'età vittoriana sarebbe quel periodo storico
> compreso tra il 1837 e il 1901 sotto la
> reggenza della regina Vittoria
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In tale periodo relazioni con femmine di 10 anni
> erano accettate legalmente e relazioni emozionali
> anche con più giovani erano accetate
> culturalmente
>
> celebri caso sono quelli di Lewis Carrol e
> Charlie Chaplin entrambi
> GL
>
>
> Le femmine era culturalmente considerate come
> come esseri puri e puliti "da venerare".
>
> A causa di questa visione, i loro corpi erano
> visti come templi che non dovevano essere
> adornati con gioielli né essere utilizzati per
> sforzi fisici.
>
>
> probabilmente una fresca e pura giovinetta lo
> era ancor più e interessarsi romanticamente a lei
> era vista come cosa alta e nobile





e non a caso anche nel vestrire si rispiecchiava questa visione

avevano quei vestiti candidi e puliti che richiamavano la fugura della donna angelo











certi vestiti erano davvero bellissimi tanto che ancor oggi sono ripresi da stilisti moderni (vedi topic su Lolita fashion e Gothic lolita)

sembravano delle bomboniere

Inizia a starmi simpatica questa signora



che donnone

Girovita: 130 centimetri. Anno di produzione: 1890. Di certo non sono sexy, ma sono un pezzo di storia i 'mutandoni' della regina Vittoria d'Inghilterra, che regnò dal 1837-1901. E infatti sono stati venduti all'asta da Charles Hanson per la bellezza di 4.500 sterline (5.723 euro circa). Ad accaparrarsi il capo intimo, che riporta ricamato il monogramma 'VR', è stato un canadese. Vendute anche una camicia e una camicia da notte della queen Victoria, rispettivamente per 5mila e 7mila euro (Epa)

- Scritto da:
>
> > capite perchè la pedofilia era accetata ? perchè
> > era considerata all'opposto di quello che viene
> > di solito considerata adesso come una cosa
> sporca
> > e zozza anzi era vista come una cosa pura
> >
> > e casta .
>
> La pedofilia accetta brutto stronzo ? E da chi ?
>
> Dai bastardi schifosi che caricavano le
> poverissime bambine costrette dalla fame a
> prostituirsi con migliaia di maiali tuoi
> pari..
>
> Eccotela la tua "merda accettata", alla pari del
> peffiore schiavismo capitalista che in quel
> periodo storico aveva raggiunto i suoi massimi
> livelli di sopraffazione, in cui uomini, donne e
> b-a-m-b-i-n-i venivano presi e sfruttati peggio
> delle
> bestie..
>
> Eccotelo il tuo "mondo ideale" ideale, nazista di
> merda..




non scambiano le carte ,una cosa sono le relazioni una cosa è la prostituzione


secondo te l'accettazione sarebbe dovuta ad una manovra maschilista attuata da sporchi maschilisti al potere

ma il bello è che ai vertici c'era una DONNA! la regiona Vittoria!

vedi che il tuo ragionamento decade

- Scritto da: avvelentani
> Ora ti serve solo una macchina del tempo.

già
cmq una cultura simile è presente nell'Islam

- Scritto da:
>
> L'età vittoriana sarebbe quel periodo storico
> compreso tra il 1837 e il 1901 sotto la
> reggenza della regina Vittoria
>
>
> [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons


L'era vittoriana, periodo bigotto per eccellenza, in cui a fare da padrone erano le apparenze, infatti SOLO quando la merda è venuto a galla nelle strade in TUTTO il suo lurido putridume le cose sono cambiate..

Un vero peccato per tutti quei ricchi debosciati in cerca di svago..

Toh, guarda la combinazione, ESATTAMENTE ciò che sta succedendo ORA nella rete..

Ora ti serve solo una macchina del tempo.

L'età vittoriana sarebbe quel periodo storico compreso tra il 1837 e il 1901 sotto la reggenza della regina Vittoria









In tale periodo relazioni con femmine di 10 anni erano accettate legalmente e relazioni emozionali anche con più giovani erano accetate culturalmente

celebri caso sono quelli di Lewis Carrol e Charlie Chaplin entrambi GL


Le femmine era culturalmente considerate come
come esseri puri e puliti "da venerare".

A causa di questa visione, i loro corpi erano visti come templi che non dovevano essere adornati con gioielli né essere utilizzati per sforzi fisici.

probabilmente una fresca e pura giovinetta lo era ancor più e interessarsi romanticamente a lei era vista come cosa alta e nobile




Il corpo della donna come elemento puro

Il corpo della donna era visto come un elemento puro e pulito, tranne quando ella entrava nel periodo mestruale.






capite perchè la pedofilia era accetata ? perchè era considerata all'opposto di quello che viene di solito considerata adesso come una cosa sporca e zozza anzi era vista come una cosa pura
e casta .

Statutory Rape Laws

MORALITY AND THE LAW XCII

By Stephen Ellis



THE MORALITY OF STATUTORY RAPE



It has been a year and a half since I wrote about the statutory age of consent, but no BLOG, before or since, has caused as much readership response. The recent event in Georgia that resulted in a young boy (Genarlow Wilson), age 17, being sentenced to ten years in prison for having consensual (oral) sex with a 15 year old girl has catapulted the subject back into the headlines. To me, it was bad enough to sentence the boy (also a minor) to 10 years in prison, but, shortly after he was sentenced, the Georgia State Legislature saw the foolishness of their statutory rape laws and changed the crime from a felony to a misdemeanor with a maximum of a 1 year sentence.



            In the true spirit of Mike Nifong (the North Carolina D.A. who prosecuted the boys from Duke on a phony rape charge), the attorney general of Georgia, Thurbert Baker, refused to obey the court order to release Generalow Wilson (who had already served 4 years of his sentence), and is appealing the court order so Wilson can be kept in prison for 6 more years. I am constantly astonished by the extremely poor caliber of the men we elect to be our top law-enforcement officers in our cities, states and nationally.



            All statutory rape laws on the books today are unenforceable! The rape laws were legislated without any consideration of reality. Saying that a girl must be 18 years of age to consent to sex is laughable. By age 18, more than 90% of all girls have been sexually active. There was a recent report out of Washington stating that 20% of all 4th grade girls have been sexually active. I’m not taking a position with regard to young people having sex. Since time began, they have been having sex, and putting some unenforceable laws on our books is not going to reduce the rush of hormones or physical pleasure seeking in children.



            Consider our silly laws concerning sexual activity among children: In the United States, the uniform age of sexual consent prior to 1886 (a little more than a century ago) was 7 years old. That meant that a 7-year old could consent to sex. After 1886, the age of consent was raised to 10 in most states (Delaware stayed with the 7 year old standard).

   

Then, in the 1930s and 1940s, the religious “right” stepped in and got the states to pass laws that no girl under the age of 18 could consent to sex (21 in Montana). These laws were every bit as brainless as the laws giving a 7-year old the right to consent. Fortunately, most states (including Montana) have since modified their “age-of-consent” laws although even setting it at age 16 ignores the fact that more than 50% of children are sexually active by that age. Believe it or not, there are still 18 states that have laws against masturbation on their books.



The new age of consent laws created a lot of problems: a lot of kids have been sent to prison for “doing what comes naturally”. It has become common practice for the courts to send underage male participants to jail while treating their underage female participants as "victims". It has created a paranoia among male adults who, normally and naturally, want to be affectionate with children. Children like to be held and fondled in an affectionate and loving way, but now most men are afraid to even touch a niece or nephew, no less hug them or, playfully, toss them up, because someone will report them as a child molester.



Children are being deprived of a very important “closeness” with adults in growing up that may well affect their lives and relationships as adults. For some reason, the female’s testimony is always believed. There is a totally false concept in our courts that children (especially female children) don’t lie. This absurd belief has resulted in numerous good lives being permanently ruined (The McMartin Pre School Case), fathers being barred from seeing their children in divorce cases, even neighborhood squabbles will ridiculously allege child-abuse.



In ancient Greece and Rome, male children were used as sexual playthings even more than girls. It was expected that a young, male, apprentice would satisfy "all" of his master’s needs…just as the master had done for his master when he was a boy. That was the way things were. Read Socrates and you will find several times he mentions he would much prefer to have sex with a young boy than with a woman…even though Socrates had a wife and children. During that era it was common courtesy to provide your house guest with one of your children to share the guest’s bed to warm and satisfy his/her sexual needs. This was still practiced among the wealthy in Victorian England.



Our history books are full of political "marriages" of kings to young princesses, many from 3 to 9 years old.



Read your Bible: In the times of King Solomon, it was legal to sell any child over the age of 3 years and 1 day for sexual purposes. Many men took children into their homes to use for their own pleasure and to use as slaves and concubines ("marriage", as we know it today, did not exist). Among those men were rabbis, early evangelists, and assorted other holy men of various beliefs. This was a cultural norm and no one felt violated or damaged. Hard to imagine? The Old Testament tells us that Moses himself ordered his men to kill everyone in a village except the young girls, and his men could do anything they wanted to with them.



There are still any number of cultural societies in the world today who continue to allow their children to enjoy sex openly.



I strongly recommend any of my readers who are curious about the different laws in different states check out the information on http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/rpt/2003-R-...



And remember, no matter what I write; no matter how foolish I believe some laws to be; my position is to uphold the laws until they are changed.
http://journals.aol.com/stebrel/MoralityandtheLaw/...