-
x i complottistiScritto daavvelentaniCubicolarioil 2008-08-30 08:18:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 08:18:00.0Trollate totali: 18184That's just one broad objection to all the bullshit theories. But try suggesting it to someone in the midst of a 9/11 fairytale reverie, and they'll pull a face and say, "Yeah, but ... " and start banging on about some easily misinterpreted detail that "makes you think" (when it doesn't) or "contradicts the official story" (when you misinterpret it). Like nutbag creationists, they fixate on thinly spread, cherry-picked nuggets of "evidence" and ignore the thundering mass of data pointing the other way.
And when repeatedly pressed on that one, basic, overall point - that a conspiracy this huge would be impossible to pull off - they huff and whine and claim that unless you've sat through every nanosecond of Loose Change (the conspiracy flick du jour) and personally refuted every one of its carefully spun "findings" before their very eyes, using a spirit level and calculator, you have no right to an opinion on the subject.http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/1...
I think happiness is love
- Vladimir Putin-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daThe LichÜbermenschil 2008-08-30 08:50:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 08:50:00.0Trollate totali: 21351
- Scritto da: avvelentani
> That's just one broad objection to all the
> bullshit theories. But try suggesting it to
> someone in the midst of a 9/11 fairytale reverie,
> and they'll pull a face and say, "Yeah, but ... "
> and start banging on about some easily
> misinterpreted detail that "makes you think"
> (when it doesn't) or "contradicts the official
> story" (when you misinterpret it). Like nutbag
> creationists, they fixate on thinly spread,
> cherry-picked nuggets of "evidence" and ignore
> the thundering mass of data pointing the other
> way.
>
> And when repeatedly pressed on that one, basic,
> overall point - that a conspiracy this huge would
> be impossible to pull off - they huff and whine
> and claim that unless you've sat through every
> nanosecond of Loose Change (the conspiracy flick
> du jour) and personally refuted every one of its
> carefully spun "findings" before their very eyes,
> using a spirit level and calculator, you have no
> right to an opinion on the
> subject.
>
>
-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daavvelentaniCubicolarioil 2008-08-30 08:57:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 08:57:00.0Trollate totali: 18184
- Scritto da: The Lich
>
> - Scritto da: avvelentani
> > That's just one broad objection to all the
> > bullshit theories. But try suggesting it to
> > someone in the midst of a 9/11 fairytale
> reverie,
> > and they'll pull a face and say, "Yeah, but ...
> "
> > and start banging on about some easily
> > misinterpreted detail that "makes you think"
> > (when it doesn't) or "contradicts the official
> > story" (when you misinterpret it). Like nutbag
> > creationists, they fixate on thinly spread,
> > cherry-picked nuggets of "evidence" and ignore
> > the thundering mass of data pointing the other
> > way.
> >
> > And when repeatedly pressed on that one, basic,
> > overall point - that a conspiracy this huge
> would
> > be impossible to pull off - they huff and whine
> > and claim that unless you've sat through every
> > nanosecond of Loose Change (the conspiracy flick
> > du jour) and personally refuted every one of its
> > carefully spun "findings" before their very
> eyes,
> > using a spirit level and calculator, you have no
> > right to an opinion on the
> > subject.
> >
> >
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/1

>
> al di là degli esempi portati, in quale contorto,
> irrazionale e mitologico modo l'affermazione
> that a conspiracy this huge would be
> impossible to pull off dovrebbe costituire il
> punto cardine da obiettare alle teorie
> complottistiche?
Quindi hai anche questo problema? Oh mamma...
I think happiness is love
- Vladimir Putin-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daThe LichÜbermenschil 2008-08-30 09:00:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 09:00:00.0Trollate totali: 21351
- Scritto da: avvelentani
>
> - Scritto da: The Lich
> >
> > - Scritto da: avvelentani
> > > That's just one broad objection to all the
> > > bullshit theories. But try suggesting it to
> > > someone in the midst of a 9/11 fairytale
> > reverie,
> > > and they'll pull a face and say, "Yeah, but
> ...
> > "
> > > and start banging on about some easily
> > > misinterpreted detail that "makes you think"
> > > (when it doesn't) or "contradicts the official
> > > story" (when you misinterpret it). Like nutbag
> > > creationists, they fixate on thinly spread,
> > > cherry-picked nuggets of "evidence" and ignore
> > > the thundering mass of data pointing the other
> > > way.
> > >
> > > And when repeatedly pressed on that one,
> basic,
> > > overall point - that a conspiracy this huge
> > would
> > > be impossible to pull off - they huff and
> whine
> > > and claim that unless you've sat through every
> > > nanosecond of Loose Change (the conspiracy
> flick
> > > du jour) and personally refuted every one of
> its
> > > carefully spun "findings" before their very
> > eyes,
> > > using a spirit level and calculator, you have
> no
> > > right to an opinion on the
> > > subject.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daavvelentaniCubicolarioil 2008-08-30 11:58:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 11:58:00.0Trollate totali: 18184
- Scritto da: The Lich
> >
> > Quindi hai anche questo problema? Oh mamma...
>
> rispondi al quesito invece di cadere nella
> fallacia dell' argumentum ad
> personam
Lich: "rispondi a questo, non rispondere a quello, non rispondo a quell'altro perche' non gli voglio dare soddisfazione, rispondo a quell'altro ancora perche' si`..." e che coglioni!!!I think happiness is love
- Vladimir Putin-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daThe LichÜbermenschil 2008-08-30 12:41:00.0 alle 2008-08-30 12:41:00.0Trollate totali: 21351
- Scritto da: avvelentani
>
> - Scritto da: The Lich
> > >
> > > Quindi hai anche questo problema? Oh mamma...
> >
> > rispondi al quesito invece di cadere nella
> > fallacia dell' argumentum ad
> > personam
>
> Lich: "rispondi a questo, non rispondere a
> quello, non rispondo a quell'altro perche' non
> gli voglio dare soddisfazione, rispondo a
> quell'altro ancora perche' si`..." e che
> coglioni!!!
perchè, ne sei provvisto
comunque mi devi ancora chiarire come si faccia a definire razionale l' argomentazione "una cospirazione così vasta sarebbe impossibile da tirar fuori"
The Lich™
« Non è morto ciò che in eterno può attendere,
e col passare di strani eoni, anche la morte può morire. »

-
Re: x i complottistiScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2008-08-31 11:58:00.0 alle 2008-08-31 11:58:00.0
- Scritto da: avvelentani
>
> - Scritto da: The Lich
> > >
> > > Quindi hai anche questo problema? Oh mamma...
> >
> > rispondi al quesito invece di cadere nella
> > fallacia dell' argumentum ad
> > personam
>
> Lich: "rispondi a questo, non rispondere a
> quello, non rispondo a quell'altro perche' non
> gli voglio dare soddisfazione, rispondo a
> quell'altro ancora perche' si`..." e che
> coglioni!!!
Analisi perfetta.
-
-
-
-
-