Mostra notizie nelle discussioni
  • Avatar
    ☺
    Scritto da
    ::1
    il 2015-05-08 23:53:16.0 alle 2015-05-08 23:53:16.0
    Trollate totali: 12321
    Ubuntu snappy
    http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/more-stable-fu...

    Atomic packages make applications more self-contained and stable, but there is a cost. It inevitably will lead to some duplication between packages, requiring more disk space overall.

    Ma che cazzo stanno facendo in canonical? A bocca storta
    Young professional woman and busy mom.
    • Avatar
      Scritto da
      Non Autenticato
      il 2015-05-09 00:49:31.0 alle 2015-05-09 00:49:31.0
      Re: Ubuntu snappy
      Scritto da: ::1
      > http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/more-stable-fu...
      >
      > Atomic packages make applications more self-contained and stable, but there is a cost. It inevitably will lead to some duplication between packages, requiring more disk space overall.
      >
      > Ma che cazzo stanno facendo in canonical? A bocca storta

      Atomic packages: Snappy packages are self-contained. All the dependencies of an application are bundled together into a single package, and they are shipped together. With APT, installing one package often requires multiple dependent packages to be installed at the same time. Snappy puts an end to this. Atomic packages make applications more self-contained and stable, but there is a cost. It inevitably will lead to some duplication between packages, requiring more disk space overall.

      Non mi sembra una cattiva idea Imbarazzato
      Mi sono sempre piaciuti i programmi portable e self contained. Però dovrebbero prevederli come opzione, non imporli.
      • Avatar
        ☺
        Scritto da
        ::1
        il 2015-05-09 12:56:28.0 alle 2015-05-09 12:56:28.0
        Trollate totali: 12321
        Re: Ubuntu snappy
        Scritto da:
        >
        > Atomic packages: Snappy packages are self-contained. All the dependencies of an application are bundled together into a single package, and they are shipped together. With APT, installing one package often requires multiple dependent packages to be installed at the same time. Snappy puts an end to this. Atomic packages make applications more self-contained and stable, but there is a cost. It inevitably will lead to some duplication between packages, requiring more disk space overall.
        >
        > Non mi sembra una cattiva idea Imbarazzato
        > Mi sono sempre piaciuti i programmi portable e self contained. Però dovrebbero prevederli come opzione, non imporli.

        NixOS implementa decisamente meglio il concetto, permettendo di installare parallelamente versioni diverse delle librerie e dei programmi.
        Young professional woman and busy mom.
<softv>

Pagina generata in 64 millisecondi

Utenti attivi: 12 nell'ultimo minuto, 25 negli ultimi cinque minuti, 58 negli ultimi 15 minuti