Mostra notizie nelle discussioni
  • Avatar
    ☺
    Scritto da
    Nazi Heidi
    Wakkus Horribilis
    il 2017-06-24 17:34:48.0 alle 2017-06-24 17:34:48.0
    Trollate totali: 4162
    Suprema corte all'unanimità: hate speech è FREE SPEECH
    http://archive.is/4NAqM#selection-4231.138-4231.14...

    [The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”

    [CUT]

    A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.

    Dovrebbero spiegarlo in particolare ai pulotti della Germania secondo cui è ok intimidire i cittadini che non la pensano come il governo sul farsi ammazzare, derubare e stuprare da dei selvaggi superstiziosi. Idea!
    Nobody is more inferior than those who insist on being equal. - Nietzsche
    • Avatar
      Scritto da
      Non Autenticato
      il 2017-06-24 20:15:24.0 alle 2017-06-24 20:15:24.0
      Re: Suprema corte all'unanimità: hate speech è FREE SPEECH
      Scritto da: Nazi Heidi
      > http://archive.is/4NAqM#selection-4231.138-4231.14...
      >
      > [The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”
      >
      > [CUT]
      >
      > A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.
      >
      > Dovrebbero spiegarlo in particolare ai pulotti della Germania secondo cui è ok intimidire i cittadini che non la pensano come il governo sul farsi ammazzare, derubare e stuprare da dei selvaggi superstiziosi. Idea!

      Mi chiedo a quando risalga questa sentenza, ma supponendo sia recente mi chiedo anche se sarebbe stata diversa se al governo ci fosse stata la banda della Clinton.
<softv>

Pagina generata in 51 millisecondi

Utenti attivi: 16 nell'ultimo minuto, 38 negli ultimi cinque minuti, 59 negli ultimi 15 minuti