Forum libero

http://atavisionary.com/how-expensive-are-women/

The feminine imperative results in massive increases in the size and scope of government; especially in increasing taxation to facilitate wealth transfers to the poor and increasing wealth transfers from men to women post-divorce. Women’s suffrage has been shown to have caused between a 25 and 33% increase in government expenditure within 11 years of its implementation for various governments at various times

[CUT]

According to IRS data, men in the US pay substantially more (almost double) in taxes than women; mainly because of their higher income.

[CUT]

Men earn more partially because of their greater devotion to the workforce in terms of hours worked per week and more uninterrupted, consecutive years of participation in the workforce. Superhaplotypes of the X chromosome also cause there to be a greater number of very high IQ men than very high IQ women which causes men to be over-represented in the highest paid positions that require high intelligence. Such professions tend to pay more due to their greater difficulty and the limited number of people able to perform them.

[CUT]

On the other side of the coin, women receive substantially more income support benefits compared to men both in terms of monetary value per woman and in the number of women receiving benefits. How much more women receive than men varies with age, but it is higher at all ages and peaks at 4.8 times what men receive during the 35-39 age range. This is likely due to the increased support given to single mothers with dependents.

[CUT]

This wealth, which would be better spent by productive men providing for their own biological children, is forcibly taken from them to pay for women who have made extremely poor personal decisions in their lives and produced children statistically much more likely to be involved in criminal and disorderly behavior. The increased criminality of children of single mothers is a large externality which costs a society a great deal in terms of increasing police and prison spending on top of the direct wealth transfer programs.

[CUT]

Men go to the doctor and need medical care much less frequently than women.

[CUT]

The result is that healthcare costs for young men have increased substantially more than for women of all ages. The average increase was 56% for men compared to 4% for women though in specific areas the average increase for young men has been as high as 200%.

[CUT]

Virtually no quantitative indicators show that women as a population have any real capacity for being truly independent. They are heavily dependent on being subsidized by male taxpayers, husbands, and ex-husbands. The obvious conclusion that can be drawn from gender differences in taxation and benefits is that this data clearly demonstrates that modern “equality” is largely fraudulent. Women are no more independent now than they were when they were restricted to being housewives. The main difference between traditional societies and today is not that women are more independent, but that they are less directly dependent and more indirectly dependent on the productivity of men. They are, as a group, heavily reliant on state mediated wealth transfers from men.

[CUT]

In the past, men were only responsible for providing for their own wives and children. This constituted a fair and reciprocal symbiotic relationship between men and women. Men produced surplus to support their wives and children, and in return wives provided various household services and produced children for their husbands. Today, the once symbiotic relationship has morphed into a parasitic relationship where women depend on the coercive power of the government to extract wealth from men while providing little to men in return; both directly from fathers through child support and alimony that comes with easy divorce and indirectly through socialized healthcare, welfare, and retirement benefits. Maintaining this false, superficial equality requires an absolutely massive wealth transfer. The result is that working-age men have substantially less wealth to afford forming families of their own. [ma tu guarda, cioè proprio quello che dicevo io]

[CUT]

This combines with the increasingly well-known costs of frivolous divorce to men to discourage marriage and disproportionately decreases the fertility of especially productive men relative to the less productive. Productive men have more that can be stolen so they take precautions to limit what can be taken by the state or potential future ex-wives. Given the genetic heritability of psychological traits, this drop in fertility guarantees that future generations will progressively have smaller and smaller proportions of productive men who can keep the current system solvent.

TL;DR:
1) il suffragio universale ha provocato l'aumento della tassazione e dal 25 al 33% in più nelle spese del governo
2) le femmine pagano meno tasse dei maschi perché i maschi lavorano di più e con più dedizione
3) le femmine consumano molto più welfare dei maschi, fino a quasi 5 volte di più in alcune fasce d'età
4) i maschi guadagnano di più semplicemente per via del punto 2 e per via del fatto che in generale ci sono più maschi dai QI elevato che femmine e che, quindi, finiscono nei posti chiave molto ben pagati rispetto alle femmine
5) le femmine, da sole, non sono in grado di crescere figli produttivi nella società e buoni cittadini
6) le femmine usano i servizi sanitari più dei maschi (spesso per fesserie e fissazioni, aggiungo io) cosa che ha incrementato i costi della sanità anche per i maschi, anzi, SOPRATTUTTO per i maschi
7) nonostante tutti i femminismi e le leggi a vantaggio delle sole femmine, non ci sono indicazioni che le femmine siano davvero in grado di essere indipendenti dai maschi... direttamente o indirettamente dipendono dai loro soldi
il femminismo ha distrutto quella che prima era una relazione simbiotica fra maschi e femmine trasformandola in una relazione parassitica in cui le femmine rubano ai maschi dando poco o nulla in cambio e portando la società al fallimento