Forum libero

Scritto da: Mattia
> Scritto da: Rick Sanchez
> > Scritto da:
> > > Stabiliamo un po' di verità storica: i bianchi importarono deliberatamente schiavi per farli lavorare nelle piantagioni. I negri fecero una rivoluzione.
> >
> > Balle.
> > I bianchi importarono i negri per lavorare, POI LI LIBERARONO. Quando furono liberati fecero un massacro. È tutto raccontato nel video che ho postato.
>
> Che cazzo dici, si sono autoliberati con una rivoluzione.

Come al solito tendi ad semplificare le questioni perché: 1) non le conosci e 2) la realtà è troppo complicata per te.

La così detta "rivoluzione" dei negri non sarebbe nemmeno mai incominciata se non fosse per il fatto che la Francia, dopo la rivoluzione Francese, stava inviando ad Haiti l'esercito per liberare i mulatti (figli di bianchi con negri che godevano di alcuni diritti più degli schiavi ma anche di limitazioni). Quando i negri seppero che di fatto Haiti era sotto assedio dai liberali francesi e che volevano liberarli hanno cominciato a massacrare tutti i bianchi che potevano, bambini inclusi le cui teste erano messe come avvertimento su dei bastoni davanti al loro "esercito"... perché le bassezze a cui arrivano i negri lasciati liberi di fare quello che vogliono difficilmente le trovi in occidente (con qualche eccezione, naturalmente), da loro invece sono la normalità.

In altre parole, la Francia già voleva che i negri fossero liberati e la cosa ha mandato Haiti nel caos più totale.

L'intera storia è spiegata sia nel video che nell'articolo che ho postato, non ti resta da fare altro che imparare a leggere ed ascoltare.

At the time of the French Revolution in 1789, French San Domingo was at its most prosperous. In the rich aluvial Plaine du Nord there were a thousand plantation houses set behind pillared gateways, which sparkled at night with the illumination of elaborate balls. The colony was one of the leading exporters of coffee, sugar, cocoa and cotton, and in 1789 the dollar value of its trade exceeded that of the United States. However, its affluence was based on a fragile racial dynamic of 40,000 whites ruling 500,000 black slaves–the majority African-born. There was also an intermediate class of 27,000 mulattos who had come about because of an initial scarcity of white women, and which would play an important role in the future of the colony.

Even after the arrival of French women, it was common for wealthy whites to keep mulatto mistresses. Still, the color line was well observed when it came to marriage. The few white men who married mulattos were shunned by white society and stripped of many rights-with the French government’s approval. One priest who had refused marriage to a white and a mulatto was commended by a French minister who wrote: “His Majesty’s pleasure is not to permit the mixing of the bloods; your prevention of the marriage in question is therefore approved.”

Officially classified as “free people of color,” mulattos could own land, businesses, and even slaves. They despised the slaves but resented the whites, to whom they were subordinate. Mulattos could not vote or hold office. They were segregated in theaters, shops and churches, and even the wealthiest mulatto was the social inferior of the poorest white.

Whites of all classes as well as the authorities in France considered the color line natural and necessary. Outnumbered 13-to-1 by blacks and mulattos, whites had good reason to stay united in the face of occasional uprisings on rural plantations in which slaves slaughtered all the whites they could catch. Moreover, the French blamed the relative failure of Spanish and Portuguese colonies on miscegenation, and did not want to make the same mistake. Whites would maintain the color line at all costs, but the bitterness of the mixed-race class would soon find a sympathetic ear. In the words of the revolutionary leader Honoré de Mirabeau, whites “slept on the edge of Vesuvius.”

The French Revolution

After the French Revolution and the overthrow of Louis XVI, most whites in San Domingo expected to receive more say in running the colony. This hope turned to terror as they learned of the new regime’s revolutionary racial plans. In 1788 a French pamphleteer named Jacques Brissot had formed the Amis des Noirs (Friends of the Blacks). Patterned after English abolitionist groups, the society soon became far more radical. Most of the future Jacobin leaders such as Lafayette, Condorcet, Mirabeau and Robbespierre were members, and chapters soon spread throughout France. San Domingo was subject to French rule, and colonists began to wonder how far these zealots would take their slogan “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.”

Almost from the beginning, the National Assembly in Paris pushed for full citizenship rights for mulattos. Mulattos were emboldened and whites distressed when the Jacobins announced in 1792 they were sending a civil commission-supported by 6,000 troops-to San Domingo to enforce the rights of mulattos. When the black slaves heard the news they went into open revolt in the hope that they, too, would get freedom. Whites in San Domingo were therefore under siege from slaves, mulattos and their own government. One white who managed to return to France predicted the outcome: “You may announce unreservedly that it is all over with San Domingo. One of three things will follow: the whites will exterminate the whole mulatto caste; the mulattos will destroy the whites; or the negroes will profit by these dissensions to annihilate both the whites and the mulattos. But in any case, San Domingo should be erased from the maps of France.”

The commission arrived and went to work, forcing whites to recognize full citizenship rights for mulattos. The result was chaos and race war. By 1793, most whites had either been killed or fled to France or the United States. (About 10,000 settled in the U.S. where they were received sympathetically. Many soldiers who had accompanied the French commission also left with them rather than help destroy their own people.)

With the defeat of the whites, mulattos expected to rule in their place, exploiting the labor of black slaves, but the blacks, led by General Pierre Dominique Toussaint L’Ouverture (1743–1803) and supported by the French government, rose up against the mulattos. Badly outnumbered and without allies, “the yellow caste” soon met the same fate as the whites. L’Ouverture and his troops slaughtered them by the thousand.

By 1801, the former slave was supreme ruler of San Domingo. He strengthened ties with the British, who helped keep his troops well armed in exchange for supplies from the naturally rich island. In 1800 he invited whites back to the island, assuring them they would be well treated. A few thousand returned. He gave many back their plantations and ordered most blacks to work for the whites and for the state. The powerful military made short work of anyone who opposed this neo-slavery. When L’Ouverture’s nephew, a black general named Moyse, led a revolt against these “pro-white” policies L’Ouverture put down the insurrection and executed his nephew. In 1801 he drew up a new constitution and appointed himself “Governor for life” with the right to appoint his successor. Much like post-colonial African leaders, the “black George Washington,” as he is often called, made himself dictator.

Quindi riassumendo:
La società ad Haiti era composta da bianchi, mulatti e negri. I negri e i mulatti erano in proporzione 13-1 con i bianchi. I mulatti non erano schiavi, godevano di alcuni diritti ma non tutti. Dopo la rivoluzione francese in Francia presero il controllo i "liberté, egalité, fraternité" e vollero obbligare Haiti a dare parità di diritti ai mulatti (e in seguito ai negri) inviandoci l'esercito.

A quel punto mulatti e negri si ribellarono. Fu una ribellione insensata perché, come ho detto, i francesi, che si erano lasciati infettare dalla malattia mentale del "siamotuttiugualivolemosetuttibene" avevano _già_ deciso che dovevano essere liberi. Se avessero aspettato il naturale svolgersi degli eventi non sarebbe stato necessario per loro fare proprio nulla e tantomeno iniziare un massacro coinvolgendo gente che non c'entrava un cazzo solo perché avevano la pelle bianca.

Dopo i bianchi, toccò la stessa sorte ai mulatti... che avevano partecipato allo sterminio dei bianchi assieme ai negri.

Nonostante questo massacro poi, il loro stesso "simbolo" della rivoluzione, lì tradì e si autoproclamò dittatore (altra cosa normale a negrolandia).

Haiti, un tempo ricca e prospera, divenne letame, perché i negri, visto il loro basso QI medio, non sanno fare altro che distruggere, parassitare ed esaurire le risorse locali per poi spostarsi da qualche altra parte (quando lasciati liberi di farlo) e fare la stessa cosa.

Che è poi quello che sta succedendo qui in Europa... i parassiti stanno arrivando numerosi per distruggere e derubarci di quello che abbiamo... e se andiamo dietro ai vari Mattia e i vari sinistri senza cervello, quello che è successo ad Haiti succederà pari pari anche qui.

**Modificato dall'autore il 02.09.2018 19:16**